Whether you are a paper general contractor subcontracting nearly 100% of work or a prime engineering firm subcontracting work scope you do not self-perform, subcontractors are often extremely important contributors to a project. Because of this, it is critical to perform both prequalification and contractual risk management to avoid problems.
Some solid risk management procedures include properly structured subcontracts which include flow-down of contractual responsibilities from the prime contract, indemnity provisions holding the G.C. and owner harmless, minimum insurance requirements for general liability, work comp, and auto as well as safety plans. I would also recommend using subcontractor bonds either as policy above a specified subcontract dollar value or used selectively for new or unfamiliar subs. Requiring bonds from your subcontractors allows you to outsource the prequalification and vetting process on the front end while offering performance and payment security from the bond itself.
A prime or general contractor can also benefit from using subcontractor bonds when they are requesting a bond outside of their normal size or scope. The G.C.’s surety company will gain comfort in knowing the subcontractors have been prequalified and offer performance security. Amongst their underwriting considerations, knowing subcontractors are bonded can go a long way towards supporting a large or unique bonded project or spike backlog for their G.C. client.
One misconception I hear often is that using subcontract bonds will reduce the amount of the prime contract bond required, and this is not the case. We should keep in mind these are distinctly separate contractual relationships. The prime contract bond covers the entire contract for the owner’s protection and offers no protections for the G.C. Whereas, subcontract bonds required by the G.C. protect them from performance and payment risks. Another issue that can often be confusing is considering a project “double bonded” when both the prime contract and subcontracts are guaranteed with bonds. For the same reasons as stated above, the protections offered by the bonds are not “doubled”, they are applied to distinctly separate contracts and protect different parties.
If your construction firm often operates as a subcontractor, it is a good idea to have your bonding relationship in place and up to date so you can respond if a G.C. requires bonding. From a marketing standpoint, another benefit of establishing your bonding is being able to tell prospective G.C.’s or owners you are bondable and including a letter of bond-ability with your proposals. Normally, we write these letters as an ongoing service for our clients free of cost and it can make a big difference in being selected for a project.
Schmalz & Associates is an agency exclusively supporting contractors bonding needs. Eric Schmalz was an underwriter and manager for over 15 years working for Top 10 surety companies and now helps his contractor clients establish and maximize their bonding. Please call 512-640-6444, email eric@schmalzsurety.com or visit the website at www.schmalzsurety.com
We would love to help!
This article was originally published in the February 2021 issue of Austin Construction News.
As of January 1, 2023, the City of Lago Vista now requires contractors to provide…
The City of Port Arthur, Texas requires a $15,000 Building Contractor's Bond. The City requires…
The City of Houston Texas requires a $2,000 surety bond as part of the permit…
The City of Waco, Texas requires that contractors that need a right-of-way permit to obtain…
So you are new in business as a contractor. And you would like to be…